Dave Dameshek Message Board


Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4]   ( Go to first unread post ) Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Do you think we'll see contraction in sports?
 
Contraction?
Yes [ 10 ]  [52.63%]
No [ 9 ]  [47.37%]
Total Votes: 19
Guests cannot vote 
RichieW13
Posted on November 03, 2009 12:17 pm
Quote Post


Really Cuts Out the Noise
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1308
Member No.: 312
Joined: September 18, 2008



QUOTE (ekweizn @ November 03, 2009 01:12 pm)
I argue that Durant playing in his rookie season in Seattle had a multi-million dollar impact on the economic success of the team in OKC when the team moved.

Possibly true. But, they may have been just as well off under either of these situations:

- Brandon Roy (for instance) stayed in school one year longer and Seattle drafted him to play one year in Seattle before going to OKC.

- Durant staying in school one more year and OKC drafting him right after they moved to OKC.


--------------------
- Richie
PMEmail Poster
Top
ekweizn
Posted on November 03, 2009 12:23 pm
Quote Post


Really Cuts Out the Noise
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1482
Member No.: 180
Joined: June 30, 2008



QUOTE (RichieW13 @ November 03, 2009 12:17 pm)
QUOTE (ekweizn @ November 03, 2009 01:12 pm)
I argue that Durant playing in his rookie season in Seattle had a multi-million dollar impact on the economic success of the team in OKC when the team moved.

Possibly true. But, they may have been just as well off under either of these situations:

- Brandon Roy (for instance) stayed in school one year longer and Seattle drafted him to play one year in Seattle before going to OKC.

- Durant staying in school one more year and OKC drafting him right after they moved to OKC.

Roy played four years at UW, but I understand what you're getting at.

How about this? If the economic benefit of great players is limited only by the number of games that they can play before their back/knees/feet go out, shouldn't the NBA prefer as many of those games as possible be played in their league?


--------------------
Uruk-Hai: 6/30/08
Cog in the Contraption: 12/4/08
Kool Kat: 1/23/09
Primanti Sandwich Eater: 2/11/09
Get out of Jerk Free Cardholder: 2/22/09
Pizza Topping Specialist: 3/11/09
Hunter of the Fox: 4/1/09
Worthy of the Red Pants: 4/27/09
Athletican Idol: 5/25/09
Honorary Yunzer: 6/13/09
Mo Dameshek Inner Circle: 7/2/09
Really Cuts Out the Noise: 7/23/09
1200 posts: 9/3/09
1300 posts: 10/29/09
1400 posts: 11/18/09
PMEmail Poster
Top
Joe
Posted on November 03, 2009 12:36 pm
Quote Post


Really Cuts Out the Noise
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2626
Member No.: 130
Joined: April 23, 2008



The reason I don't like a hard age limit is that it really is different for everybody. Carmelo Anthony could have gone pro out of high school, but he was much more marketable after his one season of college (and likely went a LOT higher in the draft then he would have a year earlier). I think a guy like OJ Mayo would have been more marketable out of high school considering all the publicity he was already receiving and that USC didn't do much during his one season.

As much as quality of play is important. Sports are entertainment and they need to sell. Keeping potential assets (the players) out of their league would be counterproductive if they're ready to contribute but not eligible due to an arbitrary age limit.



--------------------
Gambling Champion of The World - May 29, 2009 - November 16, 2009
PMEmail Poster
Top
RichieW13
Posted on November 03, 2009 12:54 pm
Quote Post


Really Cuts Out the Noise
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1308
Member No.: 312
Joined: September 18, 2008



QUOTE (ekweizn @ November 03, 2009 01:23 pm)
How about this? If the economic benefit of great players is limited only by the number of games that they can play before their back/knees/feet go out, shouldn't the NBA prefer as many of those games as possible be played in their league?

Yeah, but did Kobe Bryant provide any additional economic benefit to the Lakers his first 2 years in the league? I propose that if Kobe had played at North Carolina (or some other college) for 2 years and dominated in college (winning a national championship or two) and came to the NBA after 2 college years, they hype and interest surrounding him during the 1998-99 season may have exceeded the combined interest he actually had for the 3 seasons from 1996 through 1999. (disregarding any effect that the 98-99 strike/lockout may have had)

And I have no idea if 2 years in college would have taken more of a toll on his body than 2 years as a bench player in the NBA.


--------------------
- Richie
PMEmail Poster
Top
RichieW13
Posted on November 03, 2009 12:58 pm
Quote Post


Really Cuts Out the Noise
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1308
Member No.: 312
Joined: September 18, 2008



QUOTE (Joe @ November 03, 2009 01:36 pm)
The reason I don't like a hard age limit is that it really is different for everybody. Carmelo Anthony could have gone pro out of high school, but he was much more marketable after his one season of college (and likely went a LOT higher in the draft then he would have a year earlier). I think a guy like OJ Mayo would have been more marketable out of high school considering all the publicity he was already receiving and that USC didn't do much during his one season.

As much as quality of play is important. Sports are entertainment and they need to sell. Keeping potential assets (the players) out of their league would be counterproductive if they're ready to contribute but not eligible due to an arbitrary age limit.

The NBA's popularity was probably at its lowest since 1979 during the same period that it went crazy drafting high school players. There were a lot of factors in this, but I think the high school players DID play at least a small role in this effect. There was a perception by the public that the NBA players had developed a selfish style of play that turned some casual fans off. Whether it was justified or not, the perception was real.


--------------------
- Richie
PMEmail Poster
Top
Joe
Posted on November 03, 2009 01:17 pm
Quote Post


Really Cuts Out the Noise
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2626
Member No.: 130
Joined: April 23, 2008



QUOTE (RichieW13 @ November 03, 2009 12:54 pm)
Yeah, but did Kobe Bryant provide any additional economic benefit to the Lakers his first 2 years in the league? I propose that if Kobe had played at North Carolina (or some other college) for 2 years and dominated in college (winning a national championship or two) and came to the NBA after 2 college years, they hype and interest surrounding him during the 1998-99 season may have exceeded the combined interest he actually had for the 3 seasons from 1996 through 1999. (disregarding any effect that the 98-99 strike/lockout may have had)

And I have no idea if 2 years in college would have taken more of a toll on his body than 2 years as a bench player in the NBA.

I think Kobe Bryant was a Duke lean (one more reason not to like the guy). If Kobe had spent 2 years in college there is no chance he lasts late enough for the Lakers to trade Vlade Divac for him. He's probably the #1 pick in 1998 which means he plays for the Clippers (who picked Michael Olowokandi over Antawn Jamison, Vince Carter, and Paul Pierce). Do the Lakers win any of their titles this decade without him? Maybe they get a few with Shaq, maybe they don't.


--------------------
Gambling Champion of The World - May 29, 2009 - November 16, 2009
PMEmail Poster
Top
Joe
Posted on November 03, 2009 01:29 pm
Quote Post


Really Cuts Out the Noise
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2626
Member No.: 130
Joined: April 23, 2008



QUOTE (RichieW13 @ November 03, 2009 12:58 pm)
The NBA's popularity was probably at its lowest since 1979 during the same period that it went crazy drafting high school players. There were a lot of factors in this, but I think the high school players DID play at least a small role in this effect. There was a perception by the public that the NBA players had developed a selfish style of play that turned some casual fans off. Whether it was justified or not, the perception was real.

I don't think players coming out of high school is really what makes them selfish. There are lots of selfish players in the league today, and I don't think the solution is as simple as making them wait another year. I think teams should recognize the value that players have aside from scoring (read an article last year about Shane Battier).


--------------------
Gambling Champion of The World - May 29, 2009 - November 16, 2009
PMEmail Poster
Top
Rolling_Presidential
Posted on November 03, 2009 03:01 pm
Quote Post


Kool Kat


Group: Members
Posts: 239
Member No.: 625
Joined: May 21, 2009



The league is diluted. No ifs ands or buts about it. It has nothing to do with a spreading of talent. There is talent, it's just most of it will never be realized. I've seen Kwame Brown in person; he has small hands and poor low-post awareness. This would never have been apparent in high school as he could have caught alley-oops, and generally just been 7 feet tall. If you listen to Steve Rosenberry on ESPN's NBA Today last week, he says that because of the ridicuous amount of early leaving players, they can't scout them as effectively. Therefore, kids don't know what to work on. I bet if you asked LeBron, he'd tell you he's a good jump shooter. Same thing with Derrick Rose. You can point to Kobe and LeBron if you want, and I'll point to Jackie Butler, Lenny Cooke, and Ndudi Ebe, all incredibly talent players who declared out of high school and now are basketball vagabonds, with no hope of enjoying a college scholarship and no chance to ever play in the NBA again. Yes there are success stories, but there's absolutely no way to predict them. Imagine this:
Greg Oden stays at Ohio State, gets re-injured, is allowed to develop his game without pressure and recover without as much scrutiny, is allowed to be a kid (he wanted to be an accountant for God's sake) and comes into the NBA a more well-rounded player and happier young man.

There's no way to convince those who believe that it's about a "choice." Is it really? You really think that Herschel Walker or Darren McFadden weren't ready to play in the NFL after their freshman year? (they are intentional examples). The NFL gets off on this perception that kids can't handle it, but apparently in basketball its not true. If it's right for one it's right for the other.


--------------------
Follow Me, The Ed Does

Student at The University of Texas.
PMEmail Poster
Top
newgard1021
Posted on November 03, 2009 03:15 pm
Quote Post


Athletican Idol


Group: Members
Posts: 867
Member No.: 470
Joined: January 09, 2009



For every Darius Miles/Eddy Curry/Kwame Brown there's a Joe Alexander/Roy Hibbert/Ike Diogu. The Hornets and Bobcats traded Tyson Chandler for Emeka Okafor and they're virtually the same guy, but one went to the college for 3 years and the other didn't. Hibbert was a potential top 10 pick after his junior year, stayed in school for another year and then fell out of the lottery going 17th. It's the hype factor that gets people picked higher than they normally should. And if the Pacers weren't racist they wouldn't have drafted Tyler Hansbrough so high either. (I joke, I joke)


--------------------
Everybody loves the jumbo shrimp
PMEmail Poster
Top
NSMaster56
Posted on November 04, 2009 02:47 am
Quote Post


Honorary Yunzer


Group: Members
Posts: 955
Member No.: 248
Joined: August 14, 2008



QUOTE (newgard1021 @ November 03, 2009 09:55 am)
We all know Darko would have been great had he not been picked by the Pistons, buried on the bench and losing all of his confidence because Larry Brown refused to play him!

Is that you Joe Dumars???

You can tell me.


--------------------
Worm: "Just like the saying says: In the poker game of life, women are the rake. They are the (expletive) rake."
Mike McD: "What are you talking about? What saying?"
Worm: "I don't know. There oughta be one."
PMEmail Poster
Top
newgard1021
Posted on November 04, 2009 09:08 am
Quote Post


Athletican Idol


Group: Members
Posts: 867
Member No.: 470
Joined: January 09, 2009



He did look great giving all those hi-fives on the bench, narrowly edging out Adam Morrison for the Player With The Most Hype Coming Into The Draft Who Eventually Doesn't Do Anything But Become The 12th Man On A Championship Team Award. At least he was actually in uniform for the games. Points do go for Adam Morrison for after winning the championship about 8 Lakers went on Jimmy Kimmel and they had all the guys you would expect, Kobe, Derek Fisher Lamar, but also, non other than Adam Morrison with his shaved head! Then a great moment when Kimmel asked the group if they'd been partying much after winning mentioning smoking a little weed, and Kobe was like "Na, not really, well except for Adam" and then they cut to Morrison and he had this goofy grin on his face and he actually looked high. It was incredible.


--------------------
Everybody loves the jumbo shrimp
PMEmail Poster
Top
newgard1021
Posted on November 04, 2009 09:20 am
Quote Post


Athletican Idol


Group: Members
Posts: 867
Member No.: 470
Joined: January 09, 2009



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt5-KIPTjeI

About the 9:30 mark, great stuff. I got about 75% of my description wrong, but I hadn't watched it since June. Adam Morrison the entire way out is just awesome.


--------------------
Everybody loves the jumbo shrimp
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (4) « First ... 2 3 [4]  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll